Suchergebnisse
Filter
72 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Asbestos Causes Lung Cancer – Or Does It?
SSRN
SSRN
Research on Human Embryos – Do We Need a Reset?
In: Genetic Literacy Project, September 27 and September 28, 2022
SSRN
SSRN
An Introduction to Using Genetics in Defending Legal Cases: a Legal Defense Grounded in Genetics - Is DNA-Testing the Magic Wand to Winning (Or Losing) a Negligence Case?
In: Genetic Literacy Project Reports
;
;August 23, 2022
SSRN
The Legal and Scientific Infirmities of Legislating Nicotine Reduction
In: Genetic Literacy Project july 4, 2022
SSRN
Religious Freedom vs. Compelled Vaccination: A Case-Study of the 2018–2019 Measles Pandemic - or The Law as a Public Health Response
In: Catholic University Law Review, Band 71
SSRN
Working paper
Genetically-Engineered Begots, Have-Nots, and Tinkered Tots: (High Scoring PolyGenic Kids as a Heredity-Camelot) - An Introduction to the Legalities and Bio-Ethics of Advanced IVF and Genetic Editing
In: Chicago-Kent Law Review, Band 96
SSRN
SSRN
Muzzling Anti-Vaxxer FEAR* Speech: Overcoming Free Speech Obstacles with Compelled Speech
In: University of Miami Law Review, Band 76
SSRN
Working paper
The Bionic Plaintiff and the Cyborg Defendant: Liability in the Age of Brain-to- Computer Interface
In: Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, Band 25, Heft 2
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Muzzling Anti-Vaxxer FEAR Speech: Overcoming Free Speech Obstacles with Compelled Speech
As the anti-vax industry continues to stoke fear and incite vaccine resistance, some means must be found to detoxify their false messages. Counterspeech, the preferred mode to deal with unfortunate rhetoric, is both ineffective and counter-effective when addressing factual "scientific speech" addressing health, I show here that many instances of the most potent anti-vax speech arise in the context of arguably commercial speech. I therefore investigate other free speech protections available to shield factually false anti-vax speech used in this context, concluding that while complete First Amendment protection may exist in the context of political speech (without proof of fraud), protections are more limited in the context of commercial speech. I then investigate the commercial ties of anti-vax groups and their mechanisms used in their strikingly effective outreach targeting insular audiences: the conference and pamphlet vehicles Research indicates that these anti-vax vehicles incorporate fingerprints of commercial enterprise, thereby making them eligible for regulation under the doctrine of compelled speech. I conclude by proposing that this approach allows for requiring imposition of warning labels on pamphlets as well as conference advertising and marketing. This novel approach may provide the salutary benefit not obtainable by counterspeech.
BASE